October 1, 2023

Deepfakes and scientific knowledge dissemination

  • Acemoglu, D., Laibson, D. & List, J. A. Equalizing superstars: The internet and the democratization of education. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 523–527 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Adedoyin, O. B. & Soykan, E. Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interact. Learn. Environ. 31, 863–875 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tan, E. Informal learning on YouTube: Exploring digital literacy in independent online learning. Learn. Media Technol. 38, 463–477 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gutierrez-Martin, A., Torrego-Gonzalez, A. & Vicente-Marino, M. Media education with the monetization of YouTube: The loss of truth as an exchange value. Cult. Educ. 31, 267–295 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Radesky, J. S., Schaller, A., Yeo, S. L., Weeks, H. M. & Robb, M. B. Young kids and YouTube: How ads, toys, and games dominate viewing (Common Sense Media, 2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kind, T. & Evans, Y. Social media for lifelong learning. Int Rev Psychiatry 27, 124–132 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cinelli, M. et al. The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Sci. Rep. 10, 10 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. X., McKee, M., Torbica, A. & Stuckler, D. Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Soc. Sci. Med. 240, 12 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wittenberg, C., Tappin, B., Berinsky, A. J. & Rand, D. G. The (minimal) persuasive advantage of political video over text. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, 7 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goreis, A. & Voracek, M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Front. Psychol. 10, 13 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sylvester, S. M. COVID-19 and motivated reasoning: the influence of knowledge on covid-related policy and health behavior. Soc. Sci. Qrly. 19, 2341–2359 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Etkin, D. & Ho, E. Climate change: Perceptions and discourses of risk. J. Risk Res. 10, 623–641 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loomba, S. et al. (Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 337–348 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Curiel, R. P. & Gonzalez-Ramirez, H. Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85555-1 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Del Vicario, M. et al. The spreading of misinformation online. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 554–559 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Photiou, A., Nicolaides, C. & Dhillon, P. S. Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19. Sci. Rep. 11, 7662–7669 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scheufele, D. A. & Krause, N. M. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116, 7662–7669 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reyna, V. F. A scientific theory of gist communication and misinformation resistance, with implications for health, education, and policy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, 6 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tulyakov, S., Liu, M. Y., Yang, X. D., & Kautz, J. MoCoGAN: Decomposing motion and content for video generation. In 31st IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (IEEE, Salt Lake City, UT), pp 1526–1535, IEEE (2018).

  • Mirsky, Y. & Lee, W. The creation and detection of deepfakes: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 41 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6, 353–369 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. I. On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 14, 841–848 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, C. et al. Dermoscopy image classification based on StyleGAN and DenseNet201. IEEE Access 9, 8659–8679 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, Z. H., Lin, G. S., Tao, Q. Y. & Cai, J. F. M2E-Try on net: Fashion from model to everyone. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’19), 293–301. ACM (2019).

  • Siarohin, A., Lathuiliere, S., Tulyakov, S., Ricci, E. & Sebe, N. First order motion model for image animation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NIPS 2019) 32, 11 (2019).

  • Ahmed, S. R. A. & Sonuç, E. Deepfake detection using rationale-augmented convolutional neural network. Appl. Nanosci. 9, 1–9 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chintha, A. et al. Recurrent convolutional structures for audio spoof and video deepfake detection. IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Process. 14, 1024–1037 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao T. et al., Learning self-consistency for deepfake detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 15023–15033 (2021).

  • Guarnera, L., Giudice, O. & Battiato, S. Deepfake detection by analyzing convolutional traces. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 666–667 (2020).

  • Nirkin, Y., Wolf, L., Keller, Y. & Hassner, T. DeepFake detection based on discrepancies between faces and their context. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 6111–6121 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, H. et al., Multi-attentional deepfake detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2185–2194 (2021).

  • Mittal, T., Bhattacharya, U., Chandra, R., Bera, A. & Manocha, D. Emotions don’t lie. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp 2823–2832 (2020).

  • Chugh, K., Gupta, P., Dhall, A. & Subramanian, R. Not made for each other- audio-visual dissonance-based deepfake detection and localization. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp 439–447 (2020).

  • Cozzolino, D., Rössler, A., Thies, A., Nießner, M. & Verdoliva, L. Id-reveal: Identity-aware deepfake video detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 15108–15117 (2021).

  • Das, S., Seferbekov, S., Datta, A., Islam, M. S. & Amin, M. R. Towards solving the deepfake problem: an analysis on improving deepfake detection using dynamic face augmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 3776–3785 (2021).

  • Li, X. et al. (2020) Sharp Multiple Instance Learning for DeepFake Video Detection. in Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp 1864–1872.

  • Trinh, L., Tsang, M., Rambhatla, S. & Liu, D. Y. Interpretable and trustworthy deepfake detection via dynamic prototypes. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 1973–1983 (2021).

  • Yu, P. P., Xia, Z. H., Fei, J. W. & Lu, Y. J. A survey on deepfake video detection. IET Biometrics 10, 607–624 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robertson, D. J. et al. Detecting morphed passport photos: A training and individual differences approach. Cogn. Res. –Princ. Implic. 3, 11 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Choudrie, J. et al. Machine learning techniques and older adults processing of online information and misinformation: A covid 19 study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 119, 11 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Groh, M., Epstein, Z., Firestone, C. & Picard, R. Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119(1), e2110013119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Phillips, P. J. et al. Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 6171–6176 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levchuk, G., Fouse, A., Pattipati, K. & Serfaty, D. & McCormack, R. Active learning and structure adaptation in teams of heterogeneous agents: designing organizations of the future. In Conference on Next-Generation Analyst VI (Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering, 2018).

  • Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Dunn, J. C., Clark, S. E. & Wells, W. Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 304–309 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watts, D. J., Rothschild, D. M. & Mobius, M. Measuring the news and its impact on democracy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, 6 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tseng, A. S. Students and evaluation of web-based misinformation about vaccination: Critical reading or passive acceptance of claims?. Int. J. Sci. Educ. Part B-Commun. Public Engag. 8, 250–265 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goulden, N. R. The roles of national and state standards in implementing speaking, listening, and media literacy. Commun. Educ. 47, 194–208 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hobbs, R. A review of school-based initiatives in media literacy education. Am. Behav. Sci. 48, 42–59 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mirra, N. & Garcia, A. In search of the meaning and purpose of 21st-century literacy learning: A critical review of research and practice. Read. Res. Q. 56, 463–496 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sharon, A. J. & Baram-Tsabari, A. Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life?. Sci. Educ. 104, 873–894 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vaccari, C. & Chadwick, A. Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Soc. Media Soc. 6, 13 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dobber, T., Metoui, N., Trilling, D., Helberger, N. & de Vreese, C. Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes?. Int. J. Press-Polit. 26, 69–91 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gringberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B. & Lazer, D. Fake news on Twitter during teh 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363(6425), 374–378 (2019).

  • Hornsey, M. J. et al. Evidence for motivated control: Understanding the paradoxical link between threat and efficacy beliefs about climate change. J. Environ. Psychol. 42, 57–65 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Treen, K. M. D., Williams, H. T. P. & O’Neill, S. J. Online misinformation about climate change. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. -Climate Change 11, 20 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cooper, C. B. Media literacy as a key strategy toward improving public acceptance of climate change science. Bioscience 61, 231–237 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, B., Zhang, S. Z., Xu, C. X., Sun, Y. F. & Deng, C. B. Deep fake geography? When geospatial data encounter Artificial Intelligence. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 48, 338–352 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shen, C. H. et al. Fake images: The effects of source, intermediary, and digital media literacy on contextual assessment of image credibility online. New Media Soc. 21, 438–463 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Azevedo, F. & Jost, J. T. The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 24, 518–549 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188, 39–50 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Langa, J. Deepfakes, real consequences: Crafting legislation to combat threats posed by deepfakes. Boston Univ. Law Rev. 101, 761–801 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pan, W. J., Liu, D. Y. & Fang, J. An examination of factors contributing to the acceptance of onlinehealth misinformation. Front. Psychol. 12, 11 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prull, M. W. & Yockelson, M. B. Adult age-related differences in the misinformation effect for context-consistent and context-inconsistent objects. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 27, 384–395 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saunders, J. & Jess, A. The effects of age on remembering and knowing misinformation. Memory 18, 1–11 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brashier, N. M. & Schatter, D. L. Aging in an era of fake news. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 29(3), 316–323 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewandowsky, S. Climate change disinformation and how to combat it. In: Fielding, J. E. (Ed) Annual Review of Public Health, vol 42, pp 1–21. (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, 2021).

  • O’Brien, T. C., Palmer, R. & Albarracin, D. Misplaced trust: When trust in science fosters belief in pseudoscience and the benefits of critical evaluation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 96, 13 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, X. Z., Borah, P. & Su, Y. The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs. Public Underst. Sci. 30, 977–992 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, T. C. et al. Video-to-video synthesis. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 31(31), 13 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pollard, M. & Baird, M. D. The RAND American Life Panel: Technical Description (RAND Corporation, 2017).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robbins, M. W. & Grant, D. M. RAND American Educator Panels Technical Description (RAND Corporation, 2020).

    Book 

    Google Scholar