July 5, 2022

The educational community and its knowledge and perceptions of native and invasive alien species

  • 1.

    Yli-Panula, E., Jeronen, E., Lemmetty, P. & Pauna, A. Teaching methods in biology promoting biodiversity education. Sustain. 10, 1–18 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Gayford, C. Education: A teacher’s perspective. Environ. Educ. Res. 6, 37–41 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Verbrugge, L. N. H. et al. Novel tools and best practices for education about invasive alien species. Manag. Biol. Invasions 12, 8–24 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Waliczek, T. M., Williamson, P. S. & Oxley, F. M. College student knowledge and perceptions of invasive species. HortTechnology Hortte 27, 550–556 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, I. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. (2019) https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3553579.

  • 6.

    Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 25–55 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Cordeiro de Melo, E. P. et al. Biological invasions in brazilian environmental science courses: Do we need new approaches?. Neotrop. Biol. Conserv. 16, 221–238 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Richardson, D. M. et al. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6, 93–107 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Bermudez, G. M. A. & Lindemann-Matthies, P. “What matters is species richness”—high school students’ understanding of the components of biodiversity. Res. Sci. Educ. 50, 2159–2187 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Remmele, M. & Lindemann-Matthies, P. Dead or alive? Teacher students’ perception of invasive alien animal species and attitudes towards their management. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 16, em1840 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Hulme, P. E. Beyond control: Wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 835–847 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Shackleton, R. T. et al. Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species. J. Environ. Manag. 229, 88–101 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Novoa, A., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Fried, J. & Vimercati, G. Does public awareness increase support for invasive species management? Promising evidence across taxa and landscape types. Biol. Invasions 19, 3691–3705 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Shackleton, R. T. et al. Explaining people’s perceptions of invasive alien species: A conceptual framework. J. Environ. Manag. 229, 10–26 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Shackleton, R. T., Larson, B. M. H., Novoa, A., Richardson, D. M. & Kull, C. A. The human and social dimensions of invasion science and management. J. Environ. Manag. 229, 1–9 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Cordeiro, B., Marchante, H., Castro, P. & Marchante, E. Does public awareness about invasive plants pays off? An analysis of knowledge and perceptions of environmentally aware citizens in Portugal. Biol. Invasions 22, 2267–2281 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Kapitza, K., Zimmermann, H., Martín-López, B. & von Wehrden, H. Research on the social perception of invasive species: A systematic literature review. NeoBiota 43, 47–68 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    United Nations. The sustainable development goals report 2019. United Nations publication issued by the Department of Economic and Social Affairs https://www.un-ilibrary.org/economic-and-social-development/the-sustainable-development-goals-report-2019_55eb9109-en (2019) https://doi.org/10.18356/55eb9109-en. (Accessed 5 October 2020).

  • 19.

    Stylinski, C., Storksdieck, M., Canzoneri, N., Klein, E. & Johnson, A. Impacts of a comprehensive public engagement training and support program on scientists’ outreach attitudes and practices. Int. J Sci. Educ. Part B Commun. Public Engagem. 8, 340–354 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    MAyDS. Estrategia de comunicación y concientización. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/estrategia-de-comunicacion-.pdf (2017). (Accessed 12 March 2021).

  • 21.

    Lindemann-matthies, P. The influence of an educational program on children’s perception of biodiversity. J. Environ. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960209600805 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Ladrera, R., Robredo, B., Ortega-lasuen, U., Díez, J. R. & Ruiz-gonzález, A. Unprepared to deal with invasion: Pre-service teachers’ perception, knowledge and attitudes toward invasive species. Sustain. 12, 1–17 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Vilches, A. M., Legarralde, T. I., Ramírez, S. & Darrigran, G. Investigación y desarrollo Conocimiento y valoración de la biodiversidad en estudiantes del último año de profesorados de biología y geografía de Argentina knowledge and assessment of biodiversity of future biology and geography teachers in Argentina. Rev. Educ. Biol. 18, 46–58 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Ribeiro, J. et al. Investigating people’s perceptions of alien parakeets in urban environments. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 67, 1–9 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Gbedomon, R. C., Salako, V. K. & Schlaepfer, M. A. Diverse views among scientists on non-native species. NeoBiota 54, 49 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Ekanayake, E. M. B. P., Xie, Y., Ibrahim, A. S., Karunaratne, N. T. P. & Ahmad, S. Effective governance for management of invasive alien plants: Evidence from the perspective of forest and wildlife officers in Sri Lanka. PeerJ 2020, 1–24 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Subedi, S., Hetényi, G. & Shackleton, R. Impact of an educational program on earthquake awareness and preparedness in Nepal. Geosci. Commun. 3, 279–290 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Banco Central de la República Argentina. http://www.bcra.gob.ar/MediosPago/Emisiones_vigentes.asp (2021). (Accessed 12 March 2021).

  • 29.

    Lizarralde, M., Escobar, J. M. & Deferrari, G. Invader species in Argentina: A review about the beaver (Castor canadensis) population situation on Tierra del Fuego ecosystem. Interciencia 29, 352-356+403 (2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 37, 295–317 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Luna, Á., Edelaar, P. & Shwartz, A. Assessment of social perception of an invasive parakeet using a novel visual survey method. NeoBiota 89, 71–89 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Fitzgerald, G., Fitzgerald, N. & Davidson, C. Public attitudes towards invasive animals and their impacts (Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, 2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Canavan, K., Paterson, I. D., Ivey, P., Sutton, G. F. & Hill, M. P. Prioritisation of targets for weed biological control III: A tool to identify the next targets for biological control in South Africa and set priorities for resource allocation Africa and set priorities for resource allocation. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 0, 1–18 (2021).

  • 34.

    Hussner, A. Alien aquatic plant species in European countries. Weed Res. 52, 297–306 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Gervazoni, P. et al. The alien invasive yellow flag (Iris pseudacorus L.) in Argentinian wetlands: Assessing geographical distribution through different data sources. Biol. Invasions 22, 3183–3193 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Seebens, H. et al. Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 970–982 (2021).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Gantchoff, M. G. & Belant, J. L. Anthropogenic and environmental effects on invasive mammal distribution in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Mamm. Biol. 80, 54–58 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Busso, C. A., Bentivegna, D. J. & Fernández, O. A. A review on invasive plants in rangelands of Argentina. Interciencia 38, 95–103 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    MAyDS. Gestión integral de especies exóticas invasoras y potencialmente invasoras. RESOL-2021-109-APN-MAD https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/242964/20210414 (2021). (Accessed 20 April 2021).

  • 40.

    Bonney, R. et al. Next steps for citizen science. Science 343, 1436–1437 (2014).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Crall, A. W. et al. The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Underst. Sci. 22, 745–764 (2013).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Maistrello, L., Dioli, P., Bariselli, M., Mazzoli, G. L. & Giacalone-Forini, I. Citizen science and early detection of invasive species: Phenology of first occurrences of Halyomorpha halys in Southern Europe. Biol. Invasions 18, 3109–3116 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Sheard, J. K., Sanders, N. J., Gundlach, C., Schär, S. & Larsen, R. S. Monitoring the influx of new species through citizen science: The first introduced ant in Denmark. PeerJ 8, e8850 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Phillips, T. B., Bailey, R. L., Martin, V., Faulkner-Grant, H. & Bonter, D. N. The role of citizen science in management of invasive avian species: What people think, know, and do. J. Environ. Manag. 280, 111709 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Cronje, R., Rohlinger, S., Crall, A. & Newman, G. Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? A study to compare assessment methods. Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun. 10, 135–145 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    McKinley, D. C. et al. Investing in citizen science can improve natural resource management and environmental protection. Issues Ecol. 2015, 1–27 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Constas, M. & Bonney, R. A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citiz. Sci. Theory Pract. 3, 3 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., Lewenstein, B. V. & Bonney, R. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Sci. Educ. 103, 665–690 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Kelemen-Finan, J., Scheuch, M. & Winter, S. Contributions from citizen science to science education: An examination of a biodiversity citizen science project with schools in Central Europe. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 40, 2078–2098 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Smith, A. L., Bazely, D. R. & Yan, N. D. Missing the boat on invasive alien species: A review of post-secondary curricula in Canada. Can. J. High. Educ. Rev. Can. 41, 34–47 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Collins, A. Citizen Science in the Classroom: Assessing the Impact of an Urban Field Ecology Program on Learning Gains and Attitudes Toward Science (Columbia University, 2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Stevenson, K. T., Szczytko, R. E., Carrier, S. J. & Peterson, M. N. How outdoor science education can help girls stay engaged with science. Int. J. Sci. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1900948 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Sosa, A. J. et al. Integrated control of water hyacinth in peri-urban environments, linking science to society. In Proceedings of the XV International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds (eds. Hinz, H. L. et al.) 293 (CABi, 2019).

  • 54.

    Fundación Rewilding Argentina. http://www.rewildingargentina.org. (Accessed 9 October 2021).

  • 55.

    Cole, E., Keller, R. P. & Garbach, K. Risk of invasive species spread by recreational boaters remains high despite widespread adoption of conservation behaviors. J. Environ. Manag. 229, 112–119 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Reed, M. S. et al. What is social learning? Ecol. Soc. 15, 1-10 (2010).

  • 57.

    Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Zilio, M. I. El Impacto Económico de las Invasiones Biológicas en Argentina: Cuánto Cuesta no Proteger la Biodiversidad. In LIV Reunión Anual de la Asociación Argentina de Economía Política (Asociación Argentina de Economía Política, 2019).

  • 59.

    Ministerio de Educación de la República Argentina. Base de Datos-Información Estadística. Base de Datos por Escuela 2019 https://www.argentina.gob.ar/educacion/evaluacion-informacion-educativa/bdd (2019). (Accessed 7 October 2021).

  • 60.

    De Mendiburu, F. & Simon, R. Agricolae—Ten years of an open source statistical tool for experiments in breeding, agriculture and biology. PeerJ 3, 1-18 (2015).

  • 61.

    Feinerer, I., Hornik, K. & Meyer, D. Text mining infrastructure in R. J. Stat. Softw. 25, 1–54 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020). https://www.R-project.org/. (Accessed 4 December 2020).

  • 63.

    Oitavén, A. V. The peace garden of La Plata. World Aff. 100, 148–150 (1937).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Álvarez, C., Mario, D., García, M. E., Reyes, N. J. F. & Slanis, A. C. Morfología polínica de las especies de Ludwigia (Onagraceae, Ludwigioideae) del Noroeste de Argentina. Lilloa 54, 29–40 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Herrera-Álvarez, S., Karlsson, E., Ryder, O. A., Lindblad-Toh, K. & Crawford, A. J. How to make a rodent giant: Genomic basis and tradeoffs of gigantism in the Capybara, the world’s largest rodent. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 1715–1730 (2021).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Mason, P. The nesting biology of some Passerines of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ornithol. Monogr. 36, 954–972 (1985).

  • 67.

    Baena-Cagnani, C. E., Patino, C. M. & Caceres, M. S. Pollinosis: Some immunologic and regional considerations and the description of Melia azedarach respiratory allergy. Allergol. Immunopathol. 15, 393–397 (1987).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Villanueva, R., Gorbano, P. & Rodriguez. Estudios preliminares sobre el control de la totora (Typha sp), por medio de la carpa herbivora (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val).

  • 69.

    Petracci, P. F. et al. Nuevos aportes al conocimiento de la distribución y anidación de algunas especies de aves en la Argentina. Nuestras Aves 48, 25–31 (2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-00683-y